THEM featuring Lester Bangs

To mark my survey in Ugly Things #69 of the 1973 debates in the British press about the relative merits of THEM and Van Morrison, here’s the full text of the marvellous Lester Bangs’ sleeve notes for THEM Featuring Van Morrison (1972), all 6,500 words of ’em, which pretty much kick-started things . . . It’s Bangs, in full flow, at his very best

SPAWN OF THE DUBLIN PUBS: THEM CREATURES & A WIGHT NAMED VAN. No one would question that Van Morrison is one of the finest songwriters and singers of our time, as well as being a rock ’n’ roller without peer. He has cut a swath across music which proves unmistakably that he can do it all: write some of the tenderest odes of the day, and still get down and churn out the boogie, should he be so inclined. Liking him is not merely a matter of belonging to a specialized following, as with a David Bowie or even a Neil Young: his music is so universal, and so diverse, as to be joyously inescapable. We have grown up to Van Morrison: gone through make-outs and periods of adolescent darkness, found rock poetry sans pretence in his lyrics. turned up our radios a little louder (as he counseled in “Caravan” every time he came on, heard in his music hit singles and sheer art (though never “Art Rock”) and gorgeous combinations of the two.

Blowin' Your Mind was Van’s first album under his own name, but despite the presence of the hit “Bown Eyed Girl” it failed to capture the large audience he was destined for. Even Astral Weeks, that magnificent, moody outpouring of musical poetry reminiscent both of Bob Dylan and Walt Whitman, would not take him to the heart of AM heaven. Moondance was the turning point, of course, with its mellowly mutated R&B setting trends for years to come, and with Band and Street Choir he reached the point where each successive album was guaranteed to produce at least one hit single, bridging the gap between “serious” and vicarious mass audiences (between AM and FM, to reduce the equation to its simplest level) more effortlessly and with less rankling artifice than anybody since Dylan.

But what even many of his staunchest fans don’t know is that Van Morrison was an AM star a long time ago, a jive prince of what many aging rockers of 23 or so are beginning to think of as the “golden era” (meaning their golden era, the mid Sixties when they were still in high school) who hit the scene with all roots totally assimi­lated by the time of his first album, a sometime hitmaker and man whom, if you heard him at all, left no doubt that he was destined to promulgate some non-plastic surgery on the face of Pop.

Because the first Van Morrison album wasn’t Blowin’ Your Mind it was something simply called Them, with ‘Here Comes the Night’ pasted prominently on the cover when that song rocketed to the Number 2 spot on the charts in America and most everywhere else. The band was Them, and they functioned for Van in much the same way as the Velvet Underground for Lou Reed and John Cale, or Buffalo Springfield for Neil Young and Steve Stills, or the Byrds for Crosby and others, or . . . but this was a birth of another color than most of the celebrated legendary-group-as-proving-­ground-for solo-superstar myths of our time. Van Morrison was Them, and the hand (and various bastardizations subject to musical-chairs personnel shifts which never raised the quality of their post-Morrison music) was one of the tightest, rowdiest, most diverse groups to emerge from the Isles in the twilight of the Liverpool Beat era. Peter Bardens (organ, replacing a now-obscure but incredible cat after “Here Comes the Night”), Bill Harrison lead guitar), Alan Henderson (bass), and John McAuley (drums, piano and harmonica). Most of those names are lost now (although Bardens has resurfaced recently with some less-than-train-derailing albums on MGM), but in their day they were unbeatable. Some of them hailed, like Van, from Ireland, and some from London, but their sound was enough to turn the head around of anybody who’d thought the R&B chops of the Animals, say, were pretty spiffy; and when you added Van’s busting at-the-seams vocal and compositional talents, it was enough to even make you forget the Rolling Stones for the duration of an LP or single side. And in 1965, that was saying something.

The original Them had the best of everything, their British blues chops down so solid they could let the standard forms ride and cruise out on some stuff that was pretty damned experimental, and successfully so, for its day (some of it still is). An impeccably tight and always driving ensemble sound, and soloists who knew how to compress enough feeling and enough ideas into a few deliberate seconds as to make you sob in this post-Cream era of rampant guitar ego-tripping. And a little tiny cat who was pretty funny-looking, it seemed to us at the time (we could hardly be­lieve that that short, pudgy replica of the grey nerd who sat behind you through a whole semester of Driver Education and never spoke a word, that that absolute antithesis of every Superstar image ever stamped in our skulls, could be the helms­man of this wild night’s ride), and came bounding out of far left field with a voice bigger than two Belafontes and songs that, when they weren’t taking all the best of Ray Charles and Chicago blues and Chuck Berry and Jackson and British R&B and distilling it to rusty perfection, were taking us to sonic zones we’d never dreamed of in all our born days, headphones or no headphones.

Dave Marsh’s review of the album in Creem (December 1972): ‘Lester Bangs liner notes complement a package which is just trashy enough to be perfect. Bangs' commentary is so lucid and clear that any expansion on the songs is superfluous. With it. Them's recordings can be seen in both historical perspective and in the context of the career Van later carved for himself. It is easily the best thing I've ever read on Morrison. (If only Hot Rocks had had the same advantage .. .)’

That was Them, named after a rousingly lurid mid-50s American sci-fi trash flick about prehistoric monsters time-warped into the middle of the Mojave Desert discov­ered by a little cutie whom no official will believe till the things are crunching their shopping centers. Like the Animals (who took too long to shake their matching suits and ties) and The Troggs (ditto, except their delivery told the whole salacious tale), Them were a concept bordering on the kind of raw subversion the Rolling Stones were the pioneers of, and the Velvet Underground, MC5, Stooges and Alice Cooper later brought to high art. They scowled and glowered like a borough full of broken windows on their first album cover, even if all of ’em but Van did have on ties and one said in Hit Parader that his ambition upon Making It was to get a Jag so he could pick up chicks with more finesse. Like the Yardbirds, they didn't really understand the concept of pop subversion, but Van had enough organic spleen in front to carry all the aura of Danger the band needed. The liner notes of Them Again, their second American release, tell it like it maybe was: “Van Morrison, the lead singer with Them sometimes throws his advisors info a frenzy of hair-tearing despair . . . moody, unpredictable, perverse, often downright wilful (and god forbid!)­­ – but always, creative. On sessions when asked to alter the phrasing of a number or in­crease the tempo, he will say with quiet rebellion: ‘No! I always sing this way . . . the way I feel,’ and he is invariably right.”

Solid! You used to read PR stories in the Beat, with Hit Parader the pre-Rolling Stone bible of the rock cultists, about how Them would come to Hollywood on an American tour and when not onstage Van would sit for hours in a corner booth alone behind the biggest, darkest shades, chain smoking and emanating a malevolent aura that mesmerized and terrified and bagged him an early reputation as a lonely, strange, distant genius who could only communicate to the rest of the world through his music. And, of course, much of that was true, His songs have always veered between expressions of traditional romantic love which would have been mawkish from a writer with less talent and a different sensibility; and explorations of the ultimate darknesses of the soul – corny as that sounds, Morrison pulls it off as authentically as the sweet stuff – the nihilistic options the present offers us all and occasional pictures of the desolation angels on their way down the slag heap. And that darkness tends to be rendered just about as romantically, with a truly Irish-literary sense of doom and fear (the same terror-as-epiphany found in James Joyce, and probably just about as rooted in Catholicism).

One of the amazing things about Morrison is that he took these natural artistic proclivities and made them work In the context of black American R&B and white British pop music, with no loss of integrity. It was a bit as if Samuel Beckett’s deranged but jivecat son had decided to take on Herman’s Hermits just to see how far he could derail the 1964 lollipop train. Van ended up laying a whole new set of tracks,

From the beginning Van and Them seemed determined to shatter the mould – when you looked at the album covers you saw bank clerks and pub-crawlers, but when you listened you heard already topnotch musicianship breaking its ass to jump out of the moptop mass and be accepted on its own terms. The liner notes again: Their “quality lies not only in the rendering of the numbers on these tracks – but in Them’s efforts to break away from the popular image of long haired maracas-shaking pop groups (!). On this album, Them have introduced vibes, sax and flute. They are not content to stand still musically and rest on the laurels of three big hit records, and are moving towards a ‘sound’ very close to the jazz idiom.”

Ego and hype, sure, but Them were hardly the forerunners of Chicago or BS&T, out to prove they can play note-perfect solos by members of big bands from two decades ago and unite jazz and rock and classical and folk and blues and anything else they can exploit. Them began as the apotheosis of the bar band – some of the tracks on these two records are right out of Wayne Cochran’s dreams – and built from there into a superbly eclectic vehicle for Van’s young and rampaging consciousness. You can hear the process in the grooves herein.

Their earliest recordings, not featured here, included an also-ran single called “Don't Start Crying Now,” a legendary talking-jam roughly equivalent to the Stones’ “Stoned” called “The Story of Them,” and “Baby Please Don’t Go.” The last was a hoary blues on more archivists’ country-blues anthologies than even the archivists can count, supposedly written by Big Joe Williams and given new life, to put it mildly, by Van and Them. In fact, it was a big hit in England, where it became the theme song for the period pop TV show Ready, Steady, Go, and a minor (but as earthshaking for those who had been waiting for something exactly like this as the early Stones singles or the Who’s “Anyway Anyhow Anywhere”) hit in this country. Structurally it was way ahead of its time, featuring heartbeat bass and bitterly slicing guitar as well as Van's deja vu agonized vocal, and there are many non-purists here among us who think it the best version of the song ever laid on wax.

Released In late ’64 b/w “Gloria,” it never quite made the upper brackets of the surveys, but a few months later Parrot-London was smart enough to merely flip it over and ship “Gloria” to all the radio stations and rack jobbers (with “Baby Please Don't Go” still the flip), and the rest is history. Almost. Them’s version of “Gloria” was a monster hit In the West, but never quite made it across most of the rest of America. A few months later a prototype punkrock group out of Chicago called the Shadows of Knight covered it and hit everywhere in the country except the West, where everybody had heard, cruised and danced to and memorized the real original until placebos were unthinkable. The Shadows of Knight had lots of energy and enthusiasm, but Van’s and Them’s “Gloria” was a chromosome-blaster before most of us even knew we had ’em to blast. It was the first distinct rock ’n’ roll classic to come from the pen of Van Morrison, and perhaps still the greatest. I mean, “Doctor My Eyes” is fine and all, but it shore ain’t “Louie Louie” . . .

Van’s second Instant & Eternal Classic was “Here Comes the Night,” which managed to become a full-fledged national hit and was a delightful and surprising change from “Gloria.” Completely different, in fact, proving that the man had as many voices and visions as we could endure before turning in our brains for a mess of pottage. And its flipside [“All For Myself”], also still unrepresented on U.S. albums or U.K. either as far as I know, was a devastating employment of the classic Bo Diddley “I’m a Man” riff to build a sonic riptide that was as adventurous in its way as what the Yardbirds did with the same material, and its lyrics sealed forever the stigmatic mark of desolate brilliance on Van’s stout-sweaty brow,

Which brings us finally to those masterpieces small and large which have been gathered, reprogrammed and manna'd on all of us in the set you are holding in your hands. From “Gloria” to the covers like “Out of Sight,” all the music here is vibrantly alive with the spirit-feel, as Milt Jackson would have it, both of its funky roots and its significance as solid, ripup, bring-’em-on-in commercial rock ’n’ roll. Commercialism is much derided in some hipper than-thou quarters these days, but it’s still the firstest with the mostest pulsation when it comes to propelling you off your ass and into some primordial rug-cutting. And as gorgeous as Van’s recent work has been (and as fine as he must feel to have somehow, finally resolved the tensions brimming from his early music), any reasonable ear just gotta fess up to the fact that one or two “Wild Nights” an album don’t really satiate, especially when these early Them albums were burger heaven and wham, bam, thank you ma’am from stem to stern.

Interestingly enough, the bar-band traces were for more in evidence on Them Again,
the second album to be released in America, than on Here Comes the Night. Although, since the English releases differed so drastically From both of these in content, and the American LPs were probably selected from a body of work covering several months, sessions, and recordings from Over There – well, it probably  doesn’t make too much diff vis a vis American album chronology.) And an edited edition of Them Again comprises the first record here, minus “Call My Name” (which was as exciting as most of the material around it and memorable for Van's pronunciation alone: "When you're burdened down with cur/And troubles seem so hard to burr”) and “Don’t You Know,” a passable jazz-rock thing heavy on the flute and Ray Charles influence.

It’s also worth mentioning that much of the material here was written not by Van but by their producer Tony Scott, who would make heavy attempts to mould Van’s sound in much the same way as Bert Berns did later. The only difference is that Berns had a way of turning out hits that Scott seemed to lack. But the music is just as good, and not really very far from Van’s own early work.

Like “Could You Would You,” a great opener with strong guitar chords bearing what Miles Davis called “the Spanish tinge” and quite close to Berns’ own Spanish Harlem musical proclivities as evidenced in Van’s later work. There is a strong organ line that puts you in mind of the Band when they’re willing to be hot ’n’ nasty, and Van sings the first line almost like Arthur Lee would, shifting later into a classic middle-period (meaning circa–“Brown Eyed Girl”) Van Morrison vocal. The song is unmistakably Morrison-penned, and proves that the utterly old-fashioned romanticism of his recent music is not mere sentimental dreck (as some people, who seemingly will never forgive him for surviving those Astral Weeks will claim), but as true an expression of a sensitive and original sensibility as the darkness of “Mystic Eyes” and Weeks. Why, it almost sounds like he’s saying “Janney, Janney, Janney, I love you!” at the end.

“Something You Got” is a great Chris Kenner song popularized by Chuck Jackson, done here as a sort of mutated New Orleans R&B with a wondrously old-fashioned vocal by Van.[i] Followed by none other than “Turn On' Your Lovelight,” which is fun and tight – to hear its familiarity is just like breathing the airs of home, which is more than can be said for some recent renditions. The thing that makes recorded (basically) bar-band music work is when the natural excitement and the authority of the band are so strong as to cut through the banality and familiarity and keep your attention by the purity of that power. It’s no easy trick, but Van and Them pull it off more than once in this album, and if I didn’t want to make patrons of Good Rock mad I’d say how delighted I am at the proximity of the organ work here to that on the best records by stalwarts like the Kingsmen and Question Mark & the Mysterians.

“I Can Only Give You Everything,” co-authored by producer Scott, is a period piece of filler which ends up exciting enough to stand the test of time. Its fuzz guitar line is such a cliche it’s become a classic (Hint: it wasn’t recorded before “Satisfaction” and the lyrics were gloriously rank enough to induce the Troggs to cover it. In fact, it’s just about as close as Van Morrison ever got to true punk-rock, with his vocal overtones of Jagger, Mark Lindsay of Paul Revere and the Raiders, and even a taste of Iggy Stooge.

Followed by the perfect contrast of a prototype Van Morrison romantic ballad: “Fill me my cup/I’ll drink your sparkling wine and tell you everything is fine until I see your sad eyes/Throw me a kiss across a crowded room some sunny windswept afternoon is none too soon for me to miss/My sad eyes/Ohh, not bad eyes/Uh, glad eyes/For you my sad eyes.” The romanticism is lavish enough to verge on the sticki­ness and purple “poetry” of a Rod McKuen or Erich Segal, if not for Van’s strong, rich delivery, his incredible way with words – “across a crowded room some sunny wind­swept afternoon is none too soon” rolls off his tongue and around the rhythm like some of Dylan Thomas’ more sonorous recorded cadences – and the traces of the other, darker side of this life he never left out. The poetic sense is all but Victorian, the wine could come from ancient Greek couplets or Omar Khayyam (though it just spills in with his wine lyrics running through Blowin’ Your Mind, the other Bang album, and just about everything on Warner Brothers – just as with sweet young things, when the man finds a subject that gladdens his heart he keeps returning to it – and who wouldn’t), and the song itself is just one of the most polished early expressions of his vision of love and harmony as a state of innocence, even naivete. Van’s work really does comprise songs of innocence and experience, innocence being the breeding ground for love and knowledge the mutable terrain where darkness creeps up quickly from behind and mugs you in the middle of your purest joys. Even in this song, the attraction is in the melancholy, and when he sings “Who are you and I to wonder why we do so?” the fatalism and sense of how little it is that things really do make sense is subtle but firm.



[i] Which reminds me of the time, in the day of “Brown Eyed Girl” when an American pop paper reviewed a Morrison concert at which he must have done much of the material on this album by complaining that his music was too “old-fashioned” to be really listenable today and that no one so backward could have much of a future In the new Hip Art realms of show-biz.

Van was not best pleased with the album . . . of course he wasn’t . . .New Musical Express (September 16 1972)

 

A 1974 collection that pulled together many of the more significant omissions from the double-album and the first release of ‘Mighty Like A Rose’

And if there really is a vacuum in every joy, then the only recourse is to fill it with more wine and general animation, and pubs become tabernacles, and parties are indicated. So side two roars off with “Out of Sight,” a great bar-band cut that illustrates, like two songs on the first Who album, the English mid-60s R&B band's fascination with James Brown. Its instrumental break isn’t going to give Brother JB any sleepless nights (although with the kind of music he's making these days, it should), but this music always sounds better and has more charm in retrospect. It was so much fun to just slap it on and let all 2:21 of it grind out, especially when you know that if it was any of today’s bloated jazz-rock bands it would probably run three or four times as long and be flabby with preening solos.

“It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue” is a classic cover (and covers certainly can be classic – just ask the Stones or Ike and Tina) and perhaps the most unusual version of this song ever recorded. The piano sounds like droplets running down a windowpane, and with Van’s vocal the song becomes not Dylan’s declaration of irrevocable separation, psychic displacement and vindictive rejection taking the form of a self-righteous putdown; there’s a feeling here of real love and regret, shot through with painful resignation, as if to say “We’ve both lost something, but it’s no good pre­tending that it’ll ever come back.” A very traditional rendition, in fact, far less “hip” and independent than Dylan’s – perhaps the shift in emphasis is summed up when Van changes “your lover who just walked out the door” to “your lover who just walked through the door.” Like the emotional difference between John Lee Hooker and Smiley Lewis singing about a breakup.

“Bad or Good” is some of the best Ray Charles influenced white pop gospel of the period, finding a soulful strength in absolute fatalism just as Gospel always has: “Don’t even have to say one word/lt ain’t nothin’ that we’ve seen or heard/Get out/Get out/Jump and shout/Then you know what it’s all about . . . Gotta hold on when all is good/Make out like all is fine/ Gotta let it happen/Bad or good.” And, in spite of all obvious influences, unmistakably a Morrison original—lyrics don’t lie.

“How Long Baby" takes similar musical strains deeper into a soul blues ballad with prominent Pop Staples type Delta echo guitar, leaving Van no recourse but to rear up and ride the side out shouting “Bring ’Em On In.” Raveup time, enhanced by the narrative style which appears in many of his songs. When not exploring a bleak corner of some urban scene with a novelist’s attention to detail : “Madame George”), or merely reflecting the joys his wife and child have brought him, (Tupelo Honey), Van delights in moving on, down the sidewalk, across the steet, from here to there and across the water. I saw him once on American Bandstand in 1966, stewed to the gills, and when Dick Clark: tried to conduct his usual Barbie Doll interview and asked him what he’d been doing lately. Van drooled a few seconds of garble and "WuhhhIll, y'know, man, l just like, I just walk on down the street, right along, and keep on comin’, and come by some cafes, and see somebody or whoever, and they say and I say an’ we sit and drink an’ then walk on . . .” Clark hustled him off camera in favor of a zit-creme commercial pronto, but that reply, essentially, is what this song is about. Places: “I was walkin’ down by Queensway/When I met a friend of mine/He said ‘Come on back, back to my pad/We can have a good time’” and “When I stepped off the boat and I walked upon the dry land/Slowly!/To the carpark/And I jumped in” and rolls off down the road once more, reeling in and out of a great scat section that bridges into a blustery 50s sax solo. Off the wall and up the avenue of dreams. When he sez “out of my mind!” it ain’t like Neil Young fainting in the back of an ambulance, it’s jumping loose enough to smash your head against the wall and pour half a pint of Bordeaux on the wound! Shout don’t stop!

The second record, which corresponds except for two dropped songs again and some shifts in sequence to the Here Comes the Night album, is less raucous, perhaps, not so pub-loose, but better produced and a far more potent statement by a band and an artist beginning to feel the heady extent of their powers. Heavier on the basis of being almost all Morrison originals alone, it is really a landmark album in the rock ’n’ roll of the Sixties that nobody who cares about the music (or wants to have their skull pulverized now and then) should be without. To say it’s essential is to understate its importance – it’s more than history, it’s timeless jive that drives you straight out of your mind and into your body, as John Sinclair would have it, and maybe even clear up the wall if visceral music ain’t yer cup of meat.

Opening with the showstopper of them all, “Gloria.” This, folks, is the Rock of Ages, sure as “Long Tall Sally” or “Sweet Little Sixteen” or “Let's Spend the Night together” or maybe even “Are You Ready.” It’s a demonstrative self-contained definition of rock ’n’ roll that will have you moving or shrivel you into a Librium puddle of MOR drool. It’ll be heard as long as rock ’n’ roll endures, and never sound less timely than it did the day they cut it. A paraplegic could dance to it – it has the magic that’ll set you free like few songs by the Spoonful or anybody else. Cruising for burgers to it in 1965 was more cosmic than any acid trip, and after even one hearing no one could ever forget those creaming lyrics and how seethingly Van spat them out: “She comes around here/Just about midnight/ She makes me feel so good, Lord/Ohh, I wanna say she make me feel all right/Cause she walkin’ down my street/She knock upon my door/And then she comes to my room/Man, she make me FEEL ALRIGHT!!!!!”

Myles Palmer’s notes for the British version of ‘Featuring Van Morrison’: ‘Ultimately this album needs no bendiction. Them’s music reaffirms the primal rock and roll values of urgency, simplicity and danceability’

Ah, sexism! The joys of that utterly apolitical horniness has brought a tear to the eye of many a reminiscing campus revolutionary as he wrestles with the problem of whether he’s got a right to ask his girl to shave her legs! In the days of “Gloria’s” first ascendance, people sweated other neuroses. Just dig “Here Comes the Night” for some real sick sentiments: “I can see right out my window walkin’ down the street my girl with another guy/His arm around her like it used to be with me. oh it makes me wanta cry!”

“Like it used to be with me” (“his arm around her”)? What is this, Sunday Bloodly Sunday? Nahh, it’s just the remarkable rhyme scheme of this song which pulls off the all but unparalleled achievement of being simultaneously perfect and awkward as hell. The words seem to tumble backwards over each other in true spazz spew. Which is absolutely appropriate, since the song was about being a poor awkward pube losing his long dream and short steady to some strutting BMOC [Big Man On Campus]. Adolescent angst is technicolor and Todd-A0, and if we all came clean who has not mused more than once ’twixt twelve and twenty or even after “Wonder what is wrong with me?”, just as Van does here. If you went to high school with this song, like I did, you probably lived it too. If not, you may even be living it now. In any case, it was Them’s first solid national hit on this side of the pond, shooting straight up the charts and nudging into the number two spot only because the new Beatles single came out at the same time. And despite being a superhit, it’s a totally bizarre song, as the lyrics attest. The way Van barks “Wow, here it comes!” is enough to keep you awake nights, and the structure is unusual, changing from a vaguely Latinish balladic lament (the Bert Berns touch, again; the man never quite got the hot sauce out of his ears after his “Twist & Shout” conquered the world, and though Van didn’t suffer by it, it did make some of his music fairly predictable) into a sort of wierdo hillbilly roundelay, which is where the gawky lyrics quoted came in. There’s no doubt that is was as much a rock ’n’ roll classic in its way as “Gloria,” if destined by Its form never to become such a standard, and even ends with the protagonist playing voyeur outside the window where the objects of his jealousy carry on in every unmentionable way his fertile pube brain can dream up.

The next song is, simply, one of the most powerful pieces of music you are ever going to have the opportunity to hear. "Mystic Eyes" was an all-time brain blitz that’s fully as devastating today as it ever was; vicious, utterly nihilistic barrages of sound, coherently performed and pristinely recorded, making the rage that much more vivid. The lyrics are cornball but terrifying (an early liner says that the song was originally supposed to be instrumental and they were adlibbed in the studio, which is believable but detracts not a whit from their impact), and the guitar lines are as razor edged as anything Mike Bloomfield did on Highway 61 Revisited or the first Paul Butterfield album (both of which came out after this, by the way . “Mystic Eyes” is an exercise in pure adrenalin frenzy, Van Morrison’s darker side at its most ferociously anguished. And if all that wasn’t enough, it also contains one of the best harp solos (almost cer­tainly by Van) ever recorded. When he finally returns to his harp after the vocal it is with a savage snarling chomp!, as of a barracuda biting down.

All of which makes “Don’t Look Back,” a bar-band ballad harkening back to the other album, a welcome relief. Originally a John Lee Hooker song, it’s not as senti­mentally innocuous as it might at first appear. After all, Dylan named a movie after it. And even if that’s not really true, it’s a beautiful composition and performance with an unforced message that becomes neither preachy nor sappy. When he says, “Those days are gone,” he means no Gee-whiz but exactly, strongly what he says: “Stop dreaming and live on in the future/Darlin’, don't look back.” Which seems doubly applicable today, even if the appearance of an album like this one is evidence of the uses and vitality of the past.

“Little Girl”. Ah, nymphomania! Well, not necessarily, but there comes a point where the honest chronicler must deal with certain recurrent themes, as I said before, in Van’s oeuvre, and this is the cookingest mutation of “Good Morning Little School Girl” this side of Vladimir Nabokov. It has a great chugging construction, and voyeurism of so poetic a turn as to make a grown lecher cry: “Saw you from my window” – “Cypress Avenue,” here we come – and a dreamscape middle section: “In miles and miles of golden sand/Walkin’, talkin’, hand in hand”. Leading to a final lust-crazed raveup. Another classic – “Sweet Little 16” was a stunner, but you shoulda seen her little sister. Van did.

“One More Time” links generically to “Don’t Look Back” and “How long Baby” as blues ballad and functions as throwforward to his current stuff: “It won’t be long till I’m comin’ on home/Gonna get you in my arms and make love to you, darlin’, just one more time.” Straight, to your heart like a cannonball. The spoken section even reaffirms that “There’s a girl for every boy,” which was nice to know in the 11th Grade and nice to know now if you’re in between embraces. Their lives were saved by rock ’n’ roll.

And rescued not even once this side but twice at least: “If You and I Could Be As Two” comes complete with spoken intro: “I kicked my heart when I saw you standin’ there in your dress of blue/The storm was over, my ship sailed through!” How could it not’ve? Perfect penetration, perfect joy. It’s the eternal teenage dream, rendered in a classic ballad form: “What is this feelin’?/What can I do? lf you and I could be relieved/To walk and talk and be deceived/I’d give my all, and more I would do,” even to the point of “Sew this wicked world up at the seams.” Love will win, and despite the Utopian cast which links it to such prime slices of puppylove megalomania as the Troggs’ “Our love Will Still Be There”, Van is realist enough to declare his willingness to be deceived, knowing full well he’s gonna be anyway whether he apprehends any sweetness or not. The most pragmati­cally horny anthem you could name.

“I Like It Like That” ain’t Chris Kenner’s 1961 hit; today they’d probably call it a boogie, though it’s closer to a shuffle, a traditional medium-tempo R&B form common to many British getdown bands of the period. You can dance to it and you don’t need a Funk & Wagnall’s to apprehend the kozmik import of the words. Same thing applies to the closing raveup, Bobby Troup’s “Route 66”, which was one of the few songs that Chuck Berry ever wrote or popularized that the Rolling Stones managed to cut old Chuckle on, and even though this version don’t cut the Stones’ (that’d be a mighty tall order), its latter-day-barrelhouse piano and cheerfully (beerfully) bash­ing drums make for more great party music, taking the album out on a joyous note.

In between those two mainstream whoopups, however, lies one of the greatest pieces of pure psychedelic music ever recorded: “One Two Brown Eyes.” Sure, it preceded the fad, doesn’t sound anything like Chocolate Watch Band ersatz fuzz-feedback anyway. What makes it really chilling is that it’s so lucid, deliberate and ungimmicky. Strange as anything Astral Weeks, perhaps stranger, more vein-chilling than “T.B. Sheets,” it’s put together like no other song here or elsewhere, with elements that shouldn’t mix in a month of stolstices but somehow, eerily, do. Like the weird irony of the tinkling percussive background (glockenspiel?), not to mention the infernally, surrealistically vindictive lyrics. Or the brilliant use of the pocketknife alternative to bottleneck guitar, which slithers and slides and makes all appropriate incisions, almost as if peeling skin away from a still-warm body. A further perverse twist is provided by the underpinning of a bossa nova beat. Astrud Gilberto will never sing this, though, that’s for sure. “I’m gonna cut you down to my size,” hisses Van, and you look at the diminutive unsmiling presence on the old album cover and think simultaneously of A Clockwork Orange: real horror show. Well, he does say “Don't read about it in good books,” and it ain’t nothing like Lou Reed singing “Like a dirty French novel” or Joni Mitchell watching “all the pretty people reading Rolling Stone.” Beyond Sade. Bizarro, years ahead of its time in both that and its structure, and totally coherent to boot. The Chill as Van hasn’t rendered it since save perhaps in some of the remoter labyrinths of Astral Weeks. And nobody can put The Chill on like he can, and he don’t even have to indulge in no juju hocus-pocus; plain old fashioned cold blooded virulence does just fine.

This is not the latest or the last Van Morrison album you’re ever going to get, but before scrawling my John Hancock at the end of these perhaps overly effusive notes I must say that when it comes to this man’s music you're never going to hear anything better than the best moments of these two albums. Which is not at all to denigrate his current work, but to note that genius never stands still and when he laid down these sides with Them he was moving at a pace perhaps more furious than he has ever matched since, simply because it was all new and there were so many things to say at once that the man literally exploded. I don’t know much about his personal life, which is probably just as well for our purposes here, since I suspect that the creative eruption comprising these records, Blowin’ Your Mind and Astral Weeks laid the same heavy tax on his soul and body as that which Dylan endured in the process of living and recording the cycle that ended with Blonde On Blonde. Like Dylan, Van seems to have found a modicum of the harmony he was always lunging after in his post-apocalypse, connubial country life. But that does not make the artistic product of the apocalypse any less crucial and exciting – more so, if anything. Even wanting to believe that we don’t really want our heroes to immolate themselves to sate our vicarious craving for the truth and profundity and danger they have lived, we’ll always have the disturbingly beautiful music of the outer edge to move and keep us aware of what lies there. I think Astral Weeks was Morrison’s haunted cathedral erected on that precipice, and much of the music here belongs to an earlier, perhaps easier and certainly more prosaic period. But it’s inescapable that some of the music here, and it is usually the very best of it, comes from that singed outpost on that harrowing highway where artists push against either the looming crunch of the juggernaut or outward into sheer nothing­ness. And that extremism is this music’s strength. “Mystic Eyes” is strong and vital because for all its agony and desperation its totally unafraid.

And it’s strong because, like everything around it on these two pieces of wax, it’s real rock ’n’ roll of the sort that comes rarely and scores your life without your even trying, by its truth. Music like this can’t stay out of sight long, and if all goes well and there are no contractual snags this company may even get around to putting out a second collection of early Van Morrison­-Them material in a few months, with all the goodies and masterpieces that a mere two albums couldn't hold: “Baby Please Don't Go,” “All For Myself,” “Richard Cory,” songs from English albums like “Just a Little Bit,” “I Gave My Love a Diamond,” “You Just Can’t Win,” “Bright Lights Big City,” “The Story of Them,” “My Little Baby,” “Don't Start Crying Now” and all the others.

In the meantime, should you be standing even now in the records section of the local department store with the plastic slit by thumbnail and this package open, reading these words and trying to decide... don’t hesitate.

Get it while you can.

Lester Bangs

CREEM Magazine

Bangs’ sleeve notes – a design nightmare – overly crammed, squeezing out the very cool photo. The UK edition has a better set of tracks . . . MORE! . . . and a readable layout

Danny Holloway recalls going to see THEM play at the Whisky A Go Go and elsewhere . . . I wish I’d been with him . . .

Cat Killers: MC5 – London 1970

A trawl through 1970 editions of Music Now and Disc and Music Echo pulled in a couple of interviews with the Mighty Five on their first visit to England. The band were here to take part in Phun City, record a little of their third album and, it seems, to do a bit of PR. Bottom of the pile is the better known contemporary piece from Richard Williams in Melody Maker . . . Wayne Kramer takes centre stage.

Full UK gig list is HERE

Music Now, 1970 . . . introducing T. Rex

‘The gods have been very kind. Everything has fallen into place beautifully’

– Marc Bolan

Music Now was a weekly paper that ran for 50 issues between March 21 1970 and February 21 1971. It was edited by Jim Watson, formerly of Record Mirror and used a small staff of correspondents – Derek Boltwood, Tony Norman, Karen de Groot and Dai Davies formed the core of operations. Columnists included Simon Stable, their man about town in Manchester and Ladbroke Grove, Max ‘Waxie Maxie’ Needham’s fusillades on rock n’ roll, Sapphire’s superior Reggae Page and Pete Senoff’s America Now.

With its emphasis on progressive rock, Music Now’s most obvious competitor was the recently launched Sounds (October 1970), which it differentiated itself from with its use of colour photographs on the cover and in some of its editorial content.

Rarely referenced, Music Now is something of a small, untouched, treasure trove. Here are the key pieces that covered T. Rex’s move from the underground into the light in those heady, mercurial days.

T. Rex made their first appearance in the September 26 issue with a front page announcement that the maximum ticket price for dates on their upcoming tour would be 10/-. Marc said: 

Tour prices in general are inflated. We can afford to do it for less. We don’t have truck-loads of equipment. It’s more help to the kids that we do it as cheaply as possible.

The ploy of making themselves affordable and therefore accessible to a younger audience, something that was carried over with their record releases, was both admirable and a canny bit of marketing that would pay out unbelievable dividends in the new year.

There’s also a fascinating bit of ephemera too with the postscript on Marc’s relationship with Mark Volman and Howard Kaylan and the apocryphal news, I presume, that they had produced a cover of his ‘Mustang Ford’ with Freddie ‘Talahassie Lassie’ Cannon . . . Now, that I would have loved to have heard . . .

Tony Norman interviewed Marc for the October 24 issue with the emphasis on the moves he was making from the margins to the centre, from acoustic to electric, from the underground to the charts, with credibility still, as yet intact. The transition marked by his new, younger, audience of ‘Teenybop Heads’ – third-generation rock n’ rollers.

And for those who still had a bit of spare pocket money, Marc said his new label, Fly, are planning to issue not one but two best-of collections selling at the low price of 15/- 

When things started to fall into place with the release of ‘Ride a White Swan’, TOTP exposure and the forthcoming album, Music Now put T. Rex on the cover (December 12) – the transition from the underground now all but complete (and in colour).

I have always wanted a hit record more than anything. What could be better than for something that has been genuinely produced by one human being to reach another. Our record is not computerised music like some of the other things in the chart. All the musicians know make sure their singles are good quality, in stereo and with nice sleeves. wonder if Herman's Hermits do that? I wonder if they even know about these things?

Marc then took aim at Tin Pan Alley songwriters, like Tony Macaulay, dismissing them as ‘business men’. 

Look at that Vanity Fare record 'Carolina's Coming’. They just kept repeating that line and when I heard it the title just got in my head and in the end I thought l was going insane. They just kept repeating it and repeating it. I'm sure that record must have put a couple of hundred people in mental homes. That's a big responsibility to undertake, driving someone insane.

Marc’s sense of humour as sharp and as funny as ever, though Tony Macaulay didn’t appreciate it. He had his say in the following week’s issue: 

T. Rex feel they can spout off about all this through having one hit to their credit. I'm only the songwriter, but I can go on ten times longer than any group because I can encompass every style or change as it comes. I have to think to myself, do I want instant recognition, which will probably last for a matter of weeks only, or alternatively, do I prefer to be always vaguely known to the public, but for ten times longer. . . I've never had to stoop to copying Mungo Jerry for ideas, and never resorted to two chords and thin microscopic voices. I don't need to put things in slots like T. Rex. All they produce is synthetic pop that's trying to be encompassed under an Underground roof. . . Anyway, T. Rex really were a little silly saying that . . . we manage them, or at least my company does!

Marc continued the ‘dialogue’ on following week’s front page of Music Now:

I would like to enlighten Tony Macaulay on two matters which seem to by giving some confusion. Firstly, neither T. Rex nor our managers, David Enthoven or John Gaydon are connected in any way with Mr. Macaulay or his company. Secondly, I don't really think that anybody with any musical awareness of the last three years could seriously accuse us of copying Mungo Jerry. It's obvious from Tony Macaulay's comments that he knows little about T. Rex or our music, but don't Blame it On the Pony Express. Love Grows, Marc Bolan 

See what I mean about his sense of humour . . . Love Grows

Summertime Blues in December

There was some confusion by Simon Stable over just which number on T. Rex’s bargain 3 track single was the lead number, ‘White Swan’, ‘Is It Love’ or ‘Summertime Blues’. Karen de Groot’s review of the single downplays, in fact doesn’t even mention, ‘White Swan’. A month earlier she had reviewed Dib Cochran and the Earwigs, though she didn’t much like it and had figured the band’s name was an alias – Beatles in drag – it did, however, all fit in with the current fascination with Eddie Cochran and the booming rock n’ roll revival. You can ask Pete Townshend if you don’t believe me . . . or Waxie Maxie even

Simon Stable, October 17 1970

September 26 1970

Waxie Maxie gets lyrical . . .

‘cos there ain’t no cure . . . .

. . . hard to beat.

Moving Like a Crazy Caterpillar Fed on Pep Pills – Yardbirds at the Crawdaddy

A key piece for setting the scene at the Crawdaddy Club in The Most Blueswailing Futuristic Way-Out Heavy Beat Sound was the above article from the Daily Mail in which the Yardbirds received their earliest national press coverage in March 1964.

‘Fab. Gear. Really swinging’ scene at the ‘Craw Daddy Sunday night rave’, Richmond Rugby Club where the band whipped up a frenzy and reporter Charles Greville experienced ‘the most incredible evening I have ever spent’. Some of the Mods in the audience clung upside down to the steel beams that ran along the club’s ceiling, holding on with their ‘arms and legs, and moving like a crazy caterpillar fed on pep pills’.

What a sound! With kinky fluorescent blue and scarlet light picking them out the group unleash a throbbing explosion of sound which frequently blasts the electric bulb filaments. On the floor there is a shaking mass of flesh. It reminds you of an African tribal ritual. All inhibitions are released. Frenzied youths and girls clamber on to the beams to do the Shake. They do the skipping rope – a dangerous dance in which someone is swung around while others leap over his writhing body. When space gets short they climb on to each other’s shoulders to Shake.

New fashions could also be seen, ‘girls in ankle-length tweed dresses; boys in jeans, bobby socks and anoraks’. In one of the accompanying photographs a boy hangs upside down above the crowd’s heads, in the other girls dance in front of the stage as Keith Relf wails into a microphone. The audience as transfixed on itself as it is on the band with witnesses to the scene, like Greville, uncertain who was the main attraction.

Wall Street Journal review of The Most Blueswailing . . .

"It's a shame the Yardbirds have no image," opined Herman's Hermits' Peter Noone bluntly in 1966, "because they would be the Number One group in England." It's true that the Yardbirds—whose "magnificent reverberations" are chronicled in Peter Stanfield's "The Yardbirds: The Most Blueswailing Futuristic Way-Out Heavy Beat Sound"—remain a difficult band to peg among their peers. They were tricky to market, too, stiff and uncomfortable in publicity photos. Despite the powerful, affectless voice of their singer Keith Relf, the Yardbirds frontman offered no Mick Jagger-like threat to the female populace. One British magazine described him as "frail like a sparrow," more likely to engender maternal feelings in its teen readership.

In any case it was its succession of genius guitarists to whom the rest of the band was in thrall. The sequence included Eric Clapton, who left in 1965 over a mix of personality clashes and his own blues orthodoxy. He was followed by sonic adventurer Jeff Beck, who moved front and center with his arsenal of fuzz, distortion and feedback, and, finally, Jimmy Page, who arrived in 1966 as a bassist but graduated to guitar, violin bow in hand, foot rocking on the wah-wah pedal. Their classic mid-'60s lineup included Chris Dreja on rhythm guitar, bassist Paul Samwell-Smith and Jim McCarty on drums (the sole original member in the current iteration of the band).

The London rhythm-and-blues scene—including the Crawdaddy Club, where the Rolling Stones were launched—gave the Yardbirds their start. Their signature was the "blueswailing" rave-up, the instrumental interlude that could stretch any three-minute number into a sweaty epic jam, feeding off the proximity of an audience moving, in the words of one contemporary journalist, "like a crazy caterpillar on pep pills." Their debut album, "Five Live Yardbirds," recorded at the Marquee Club in 1964, would later be tagged by All Music Guide as "the best such live record of the entire middle of the decade."

After Mr. Clapton's departure, the Yardbirds gravitated toward commercial pop ("For Your Love," 1965), then pioneered psychedelia ("Shapes of Things," 1966) before unexpectedly and ill-advisedly joining forces with Mickie Most, the producer of acts such as Herman's Hermits and Donovan. When Relf and Mr. McCarty left in 1968, Mr. Page, in pursuit of a "heavy beat sound," recruited new members into an act that briefly toured as the New Yardbirds. They re-formed as Led Zeppelin, inheriting some Yardbirds tunes including the staple "Dazed and Confused."

Though the Yardbirds produced a string of groundbreaking singles, notably during Mr. Beck's tenure, casual listeners today might have trouble naming any of their songs beyond "For Your Love"—perhaps because the band's obsession with experimentation and novelty made their musical style protean. Singles such as "Shapes of Things" and the follow-up, "Over Under Sideways Down," are like small suites lurching between sections that seem to cohere only by force of will: The Animals' Alan Price disparaged these as "jigsaw puzzle" records, presumably less than the sum of their parts.

The Yardbirds' 1968 breakup caused barely a ripple, but their influence has endured, despite the overshadowing presence of the bands that emerged from their ruins: Led Zeppelin, the Jeff Beck Group, Renaissance and Cream. In December 2021, Rolling Stone magazine's list of the 100 greatest guitarists of all time counted Mr. Clapton, Mr. Beck and Mr. Page among the top five (Jimi Hendrix took the top honors).

This assiduously researched, strictly chronological study says "Yardbirds" on the cover, but its best passages anatomize the various scenes—from the British blues explosion to the through-the-looking-glass moment of psychedelia—negotiated by a band trying to keep ahead of the pack while popular music was "evolving at a pace few could have anticipated." The author is particularly good on what Kurt Cobain called "territorial pissings"—in this case those of the '60s blues purists who did battle with the bandwagon-jumpers in endless arguments about "authenticity." Mr. Stanfield is also persuasive about the long arm of the Yardbirds' influence. David Bowie's 1973 covers album "Pin-Ups" featured two Yardbirds numbers: "I Wish You Would" (1964) and "Shapes of Things." The author suggests that Relf's impact as a vocalist would be felt even later, in the punk delivery of Johnny Rotten and others.

"The Yardbirds" draws heavily on primary sources, reviews and interviews from the national and regional press of the day (notable sources include the Port Talbot Guardian and the Lincolnshire Echo). This approach yields freshness via some of the scandalized descriptions of then-new dance styles—"Imagine Frankenstein's monster trying to walk like a penguin and you have a rough idea." Too often, however, those in-the-moment reviews are variations on a single theme, and their lack of perspective becomes wearying. Mr. Stanfield is at his sources' mercy and you can hear a slight groan as he acknowledges: "The bands' ceaseless touring of Europe . . . meant that they were all but invisible in the British music press throughout the year."

Yet this time-machine technique provides glimpses of a lost world in which pop music was developing at a furious pace, and Mr. Samwell-Smith could seriously claim to be "too old . . . at 23, to play the pop game with any conviction." Relf displays disarming honesty as he tells an interviewer "We need a hit badly." Equally quaint are the band's aspirational claims for the "futurism" of their sound, as Relf rebrands their sonic approach "abstract expressionism." The Yardbirds had a cameo in Michelangelo Antonioni's 1966 film "Blow-Up"—but only after the Who turned down the offer.

Because much of the band's turmoil was kept from the press at the time, Mr. Stanfield's approach drains some excitement out of the Yardbirds' story. We get only a glancing view of many triumphs and crises: the catastrophic decisions of bad management, dodgy business deals, nervous breakdowns, sensational fretwork, ill health and plenty of infighting. Though the book never quite reaches the music's frenzied pitch, its reconsideration of the ambition of the Yardbirds is welcome. The band was "without peer as a live attraction," and Mr. Stanfield makes one want to step back in time into one of those packed clubs, so hot that, as one writer of the day put it, "you could have boiled an egg."

By Wesley Stace

Mr. Stace is a novelist, a singer-songwriter and the master of ceremonies of Wesley Stace's Cabinet of Wonders.

Yardbirds: Three Four-Stars and an 8/10 . . . plus!

Grahame Bent for Shindig! (May 2025)

Mark Paytress for Mojo (May 2025)

Claudia Eliott for Classic Rock (May 2025)

Daryl Easlea for Record Collector (May 2025)

Dave Satzmary for Library Journal (March 2025)

Russell Newmark for The Beat (April 2025)

Tony Blackburn Can't Make Your Way

Remarkably, bizarrely, incongruously, the bland of the bland, Radio One DJ Tony Blackburn delivered a rather faithful version of the Yardbird’s ‘I Can’t Make Your Way’. It appears on Side Two of his debut album Tony Blackburn Sings (flat, I might add) sitting alongside Four Tops and Vera Lynn covers. There’s a rather reserved attempt to emulate Beck’s guitar lines and an added backing vocal line “I can’t make it baby’, which I rather like. John Peel introduces Tony’s version [here] so please do give it your full attention

Awhile before Tony got a strangle hold on the Yardbirds’ tune, Texan and one time member of Gene Vincent’s Blue Caps, Scotty McKay, gave it his best shot. As part of the underused Simon Napier-Bell arranged contract with Columbia that gave individual Yardbirds the opportunity to produce the work of other artists, Jim McCarty took his new American friend, who he had met on the Dick Clark Caravan of the Stars tour in 1966, into the studio for a run through of ‘I Can’t Make Your Way’, released in March 1967 [here]. It’s a pleasant enough excursion, piano is the featured lead instrument, but it is all a bit lacklustre, doesn’t over shadow Blackburn’s version, which wouldn’t take that much effort, and is not a patch on Al Stewart’s cover of the Yardbirds’ ‘Turn into Earth’ that Paul Samwell-Smith helmed for Decca (released in August 1966) [here].

For a band that had a problem writing original material the Yardbirds nevertheless oversaw some arresting cover versions of tracks from Roger. Though not from that album, you might also want to tune into Manfred Mann’s Henry Mancini-esque ‘Still I’m Sad’ [here] . . . Down the road apiece, I suspect I’ll be back with more of the same . . .

Recorded after his dalliance with the Yardbirds on the Dick Clark Caravan and his Columbia 45, McKay’s tribute to the band with ‘Train Kept-A-Rollin’ (note the writer credit) is outstanding and even better in the unedited version you can hear here

Bear Family have a very fine compilation of Scotty’s tracks in their ‘Rocks’ series, which comes with a biography that is as detailed as you could hope for. The edited single version of‘Train Kept-A-Rollin’ makes an appearance but not ‘I Can’t Make Your Way’, which was probably because it doesn’t rock.

The Who Take Ronny and the Daytonas for a Ride in the City

Even with a songwriter of Townshend’s capabilities, the Who were never above appropriating a good tune when need demanded: ‘The Ox’ with the Surfaris’ ‘Waikiki Run’, ‘Substitute’ with Robb Storme’s ‘Where is My Girl’ and ‘Cobwebs and Strange’ with Tony Crombie’s ‘Eastern Journey’ are three that spring readily to mind. Moon and Entwistle’s ‘In the City’, b-side of ‘I’m a Boy’, is another, albeit of lesser known provenance, that’s worth noting.

I’ve written [here] about how the duo lovingly parodied surf and hot rod culture with ‘In the City’ by transposing California into London, but until I read Brian Chidester and Domenic Priore’s Pop Surf Culture I hadn’t known that they’d swiped the tune from Ronny and the Daytona’s ‘Hey little Girl’ [here] to give their take extra authenticity. Moon and Entwistle obviously had a liking for Nashville’s finest teen combo having covered ‘Bucket T’ on the Ready Steady Who ep. Both tracks had appeared on the album G.T.O., which wasn’t given a UK release though they had made it across the Atlantic as single cuts on the Stateside label. Whatever the legal niceties or ethics of the Who’s ‘rewrites’ you got to admit they had great taste in pop’s happening sounds . . .

Pop Surf Culture not only led me to score a copy of G.T.O. but also the Wax ‘Em Down comp, which is choc-full of killer tunes that come wrapped in a sleeve copped from an issue of Sports Illustrated that featured on its cover two hot rodders in Ed Big Daddy shirts . . . way cool

The Who and the Young London Look

March 1965 . . . Seventeen magazine runs a 20 page survey of London fashion trends . . . The Who, who were the self-proclaimed face of London 1965 [here], play backdrop in one of the fashion shoots, possibly orchestrated by photographer Joseph Santano.

At least two other images from this shoot are in circulation and Richard Barnes has used the following of the band alone in Maximum R&B. Are there more to be seen?

This one is usually cited as being from the ‘Young London Look’ themed issue but I suspect it’s from a subsequent edition. Joseph Santano is credited lower right

The Yardbirds (and Georgie Fame) also played the role of props in a Seventeen fashion shoot (September 1967)

Fab Goes Pop Art, Op Art or Just Call It What You Like . . .

January 22 1966, FABulous magazine goes all over Pop Art – the trend that is young, expressive, zany, alive, thoughtful and enjoyable . . .

photo Derek Berwin

Anne Nightingale is the issue’s guide to Pop Art and the abstract sounds of the Who . . .

The magazine’s theme is somewhat diluted by putting the non-pop art Moody blues on the cover. Inside Paul Jones puts a decidedly conservative spin on the latest trend . . . anticipating Laura Ashley’s turn to the floral he scorns the geometric. He also disses the label ‘generation’ suggesting a slight against the Who as much as against the notion of a divide between young and old . . .

Meanwhile Keith Richards is in on the scene due to his coat of many colours and not much else and Steve Marriot collects pop art robots . . .

And . . . the Who started the the thing itself moving from Mod to Pop. By the time June Southworth interviews the band, however, they have moved on once more: ‘they’re frank, intelligent boys who play space-age music for a pop art generation, and many generations to come . . .’

Yardbirds – Little Games in the World of Rock

John Cabree’s The World of Rock (Fawcett Gold Medal, 1968) makes a claim to be the first book of rock history [here] which may or may not be true but like all its competitors it would have been out of date even before the author had read the proofs. By the early summer of 1968 the Yardbirds were no more; here though they are still an active force and their Little Games album is given a rare positive spin. Their demise, however, is implicit in their relegation to being a ‘second string’ British act, below even the Bee Gees . . . There really could be no return after that billing

THE SECOND STRING

The new snobbishness among record buyers has had one distressing side effect – the waning interest in the work of the lesser English groups. There are several besides the Beatles, the Stones, the Who, and the Bee Gees who should not be overlooked. The most important of these are the Yardbirds, the Hollies, and the Kinks.

 . . . The Yardbirds were the most exciting experimental rock group of the first several years of the British revival. Always a step or two ahead of the Rolling Stones, they pushed rock further structurally and harmonically any other group. They had a few medium-size hits. their main influence came through album sales to other groups and live appearances (they are the group that breaks up the guitar in Antonioni's Blow Up).

Their biggest problem on record has always been lack of discipline. They would engage in interesting harmonic, instrumental, or structural experiments— baroque chants, electric saws, and so on—and they had, in Eric Clapton and Jeff Beck consecutively, two of the best guitarists in Britain. However they often released tracks that needed to be worked out further in the studio.

On their newest release the Yardbirds are with producer Mickie Most (Herman's Hermits, Donovan, early Animals), and the result is an album as exciting as their earlier ones and a good deal more ordered. The range is wide and the writing is improved.

Highlights include a beautifully commercial song about maturation (“Little Games”); a harsh, bluesy “Smile on Me”; a remarkable fusion of folk rock and Eastern music in “White Summer” ; a gay adaptation of the nursery rhyme “Tinker Tailor Soldier Sailor”; a thing called “Glimpses”, which sounds as if it might be the theme from a hippie movie; a beautiful folk-rock tune called “Only the Black Rose”; and “Little Soldier Boy”, an anti-war protest, in the background of which there is an ironic trumpet parodying both martial music and Beatles baroque.

Linda Eastman provided many of the book’s choice images

INTRO . . . 1967. Nik Cohn interviews Townshend, Davies and Wood

The short-lived teen pop magazine Intro lasted less than six months – September 1967 to March 1968 – before it was folded into the long-running Petticoat. Until now, hidden in four of those issues were a Nik Cohn profile of Terence Stamp and a limited series of interviews with songwriters. Pete Townshend (of course) opened proceedings, followed by Roy Wood and Ray Davies.

Pete Townshend is a talker. He's sharp, imaginative and comes out with some very funny lines. He tends to shoot his mouth off but mostly talks sense and he's never boring.

Most important of all, he's got his own private progression and, at a time when most of the people in pop keep changing fads as often as they once changed their socks, he jumps on no bandwagons.

 The interview was carried out while the Who were working on Sell Out and songs like ‘Jaguar’ were still in contention, but what leaps out is that the advertising concept – ‘one long mad montage’ –  even at this early date, was figured as only taking up one side.

AD-OPERA

‘For instance, we might start with the four of us in barber-shop harmony, really sweaty and masculine, singing the one word Jaguar’, he says. ‘Then it’d go into some maniacal drumming by Keith, and it’d open out from there into someone like Fenella Fielding talking about Odo-ro-no and then straight on to a song I've written about a girl with smelly armpits. It would all be one continuous ad-opera and we'd make it as fast and insane as we could.

‘I think that it's a logical thing to Progress into writing songs about subjects like these; Jaguars and Odo-ro-no and all the rest. Instead of putting

‘Oh, my heart is breaking’, I put ‘Oh, my arms are stinking’, At least it makes change from the usual draggy old love songs, at least it's a bit more relevant to real lives and problems.

Cohn captures the idea of ambivalence, contradiction and indirection that sits at the heart of Townshend’s writing: ‘His songs are full of calm violence, sober insanity . . .’

 ‘I Can See for Miles’ is discussed along with a recent tour of America and Townshend’s thoughts on the band’s relationship with their audience and how it has changed and in turn changed the Who:

‘The point is that if you're going to reach any kind of communication with your audience, with all the thousands of people that you can't see in the dark, you've got to be prepared to put out a lot of physical energy and sheer hard slogging.

You've got to force them out of their apathy, you've got to shake them up and invade their privacy. You've got to get tough with them.

‘When we were just starting out at the Marquee, three years ago, I used to hold my guitar like a machine gun and I'd mow the entire audience down.

‘I'd start at one end of the room and swing round very slowly until every single person in the audience had been shot. The people at the far end of the line could see me coming and they would try to hide, they'd double up in pain and they'd really be frightened.

At the very least, they couldn't ignore me, they had to react. They didn't want to be killed.

‘That's the kind of communication we had originally and that we've tended to lose. We had to get it back again . . . The audience is king and pop musicians his court jesters’.

 The magazine provided ecstatic reviews of both the single and the album

Rock n’ Roll Revival Time – Intro (January 27 1968)

1967 and Townshend and Cohn’s ideas about the pop/rock moment were completely simpatico:

Last year, the move was progression towards complexity and introspection. Now groups are tired of pretending to be camp intellectuals and want to get back to basics Already the Who, always in the lead with anything new, have started wearing authentic Rocker gear and performing Rock classics like Summertime Blues and My Way as a regular part of their stage act.

‘Pop was getting much too solemn’, says writer/guitarist Pete Townshend.

‘Rock was beautiful because it was direct. hard-hitting, loud, sexy and rebellious. Most Important of all it was incredibly glamorous.

More Nik Cohn HERE & HERE and via the tags below

Big Star – Punk Rock 1974

Ah, the thrill of the chance encounter on a wet n’ cold Wednesday afternoon while hiding out in the warmth of a British Library reading room. I had been distractedly flicking through old NMEs when a thumbnail photograph of Big Star pulled me up short. It was illustrating a 1974 article on overlooked American acts, among them Steely Dan, Todd Rundgren, Jackson Browne, Bachman Turner Overdrive, Joe Walsh and the like. But the piece kicked off with Big Star, true unknowns . . .

 This is a band that just won't budge despite the flatteringest reviews imaginable, much of which puzzlement is rooted in the poor distribution job by Stax on behalf of Ardent – mini-concern based in Memphis and run by ex-DJ John Fry.

With the departure of guitarist/writer/vocaliser Chris Bell following the recording of “Big Star 1” some playing-gaps have begun to show on the just-issued “Radio City”, an exotic, meandering production that needs compound listening before it takes hold, but they still do beautifully as a trio.

The band now consist of leader tortured punk-genius Alex Chilton (former Box Tops chieftain), with Jody Stephens on plug drums and Andy Hummel on bass. "Big Star I" remains highly recommended – an immense pop beauty rotating across the breadth of the Sixties' experience, through The Byrds, The Beatles, and Led Zeppelin

“Radio City" in probably just as great, but we're still getting into it and we’ll be coming back to it by and by.

This March 1974 sub was most likely written by Andrew Tyler (though Nick Kent would be a good second guess). Promises to follow something up that came to nothing were fairly commonplace in the NME so expecting more after Tyler had done his duty and seen if ‘compound listening’ would pay dividends seemed unlikely to be shared with readers. A week later, however, we have his full review and it’s a beauty, not only because he catches what’s so great about this album but also because he takes the still forming notion of ‘punk’ and attempts to give it some shape and substance. Not as one might expect around Iggy and the Stooges or the New York Dolls, but Alex Chilton two or three years before he was kicking around the Lower East Side and hanging out with the Cramps.

To cap it all he puts ‘New Wave’ together with ‘punk’ in his first sentence and in the second paragraph is calling ‘punk’ last year’s thing. In Tyler’s definition punk is a badge of authenticity worn by ‘true rebels and outlaws’:

 So what do we ask of a rock ’n’ roll outlaw? Only that he doesn't grovel for an audience or the industry, that he moves in a kind of agonised innocence and stays clear of gurus and lefties.

 Tyler’s punk outlaw will be a ‘musical visionary’ but not one parlaying some ‘Arts Supplement bilge’. Chilton fits his bill, ‘Big Star leap past everyone of their American and British contemporaries and set Chilton up as one of the Great Misunderstoods of punk rock’. He celebrates Chilton’s ‘snarl’, ‘nervous raw voice’ and ‘untampered arrangements’ against the ‘studio technicalities’ and reverence of the band’s debut. Radio City is full of a kind of bravado that has been missing since Revolver, he writes (and Nick Kent concurs).

What Tyler has to say about individual tracks you can read for yourself as you ponder the idea of Chilton as ‘tortured punk-genius’. Like with Big Star the history of punk rock could benefit from some compound thinking

For further reading that goes way beyond this footnote head over to Grant McPhee’s deep archeological dig into Big Star’s legend HERE

Postscript

October 1973, NME Teazers column suggests Slade to cover Big Star’s ‘Don’t Lie To Me’ . . . Fabulous

The Troggs: 'I Want – You Want'

A recent acquisition of the two volumes of the Best of the Troggs, released in 1967 & 1968, had me heading back to Lester Bangs’ essay from 1971, ‘James Taylor Marked for Death (What we need is a lot less Jesus and a whole lot more Troggs!)’ ,to see which of the 23 tracks on these comps he had also singled out for praise.

(There are a dozen tracks apiece on the two albums but for an unknown reason the less than essential b-side of ‘Wild Thing’, ‘From Home’, gets a place on both discs).

Turns out Bangs only put seven tracks under analysis on his groin thunder odometer: ‘Wild Thing’, most obviously, ‘I Want You’, ‘I Can’t Control Myself’, ‘Give It to Me’, ‘I Can Only Give You Everything’, ‘Gonna Make You’, ‘66–5–4–3–2­–1’ and ‘I Just Sing’ (which didn’t appear on either of the Best of volumes). Honourable mentions along the way are given to ‘Anyway That You Want Me’, ‘With A Girl Like You’, ‘Girl in Black’ ‘I Want You to Come into My Life’ and ‘Night of the Long Grass’.Bangs kicked off his essay with his preferred trope of directly addressing his reader in what might turn out to be a conversation, debate, argument or rhetorical ramble. I’m not sure he knows which it will be until the piece is done. Here’s the rumpus:

PART ONE: KAVE KIDS

All right, punk, this is it. Choose ya out. We're gonna settle this right here.

You can talk about yer MC5 and yer Stooges and even yer Grand Funk and Led Zep, yep, alla them badasses’ve carved out a hunka turf in this town, but I tell you there was once a gang that was so bitchin' bad that they woulda cut them dudes down to snotnose crybabies and in less than three minutes too. I mean their shortest rumble was probably the one clocked in at 1:54 and that's pretty fuckin swift, kid. Oh, they didn't look so bad, in fact their appearance was a real stealthy move ’cuz they mostly photographed like a bunch of motherson polite mod clerks on their lunch hour, but they not only kicked ass with unparalleled style when the time came, they even had the class to pick one of the most righteous handles of all time: the Troggs.

Perfectly named, the Troggs sprung fully-loaded out of the primal ordure that all great rock n’ roll comes from. Subterranean Neanderthals who briefly stepped into the light to promote a clutch of hit singles:

’Cause this was a no-jive, take-care-of-business band (few of the spawn in its wake have been so starkly pure) churning out rock 'n' roll that thundered right back to the very first grungy chords and straight ahead to the fuzztone subways of the future. And because it was so true to its evolutionary antecedents, it was usually about sex, and not just Sally-go-to-movieshow-and-hold-my-hand stuff, although there was scads more of that in them than anyone would have suspected at first, but the most challengingly blatant flat-out proposition and prurient fantasy.

That’s the cue for Bangs to range far and wide over his adolescent wet dreamscapes. His term for the Troggs’ libidinous thrusts was ‘groin thunder’ which was an image as impeccably realised as the band’s name. Its most basic expression, he wrote, is obtained in ‘I Want You’:

This is the Troggs at their most bone-minimal (which is also where they are usually most effective). Like the early Kinks, they had strong roots in ‘Louie, Louie’, which is where both song and guitar solo issue from here. The lyrics are almost worthy of the cave: ‘I want you / I need you / And I hope that you need me too . . .’ The vocal has a musk of yellow-eyed depravity about it, and the singer sounds absolutely certain of conquest-steady, methodical, deliberate. This is the classic mold for a Troggs stalking song.

Bangs developed his line:

Gonna Make You’ is more of the same, Diddley rumbleseat throbbing with sexual aggression and tough-guy disdain for too many words, while the flip side of that single, ‘I Can't Control Myself’, begins to elaborate a bit. It opens with a great Iggyish ‘Ohh, NO!’, employs a buckling foundation of boulderlike drums as usual, and takes the Trogg-punk's intents and declarations onto a more revealing level. ‘Yer socks are low and yer hips are showin’,’ smacks Presley in a line that belongs in the Great Poetry of Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame.

I hear ‘slacks’ not ‘socks’ though maybe the latter fits better with whatever fetish or ‘pube punk fantasy’ Bangs had a predilection for. ‘A two-sided single whose titles were “Give It to Me” and “I Can't Control Myself” was on a collision course with some ultimate puissant bluenose from the start, and sure enough it was banned in America’.

About midway through his essay Bangs hits the caps lock on his typewriter and finally lets loose about why all of this fuss n’ bother over Reg and the Boys is worth his reader’s attention:

THE LESSON OF ‘WILD THING’ WAS LOST ON ALL YOU STUPID FUCKERS sometime between the rise of Cream and the fall of the Stooges, and rock 'n' roll may turn into a chamber art yet or at the very least a system of Environments.

Bangs was not wrong, the Velvets, MC5 and the Stooges, he wrote, all gainfully pushed back against the tide of musical civility but they could not be the primal thing itself, they were all too knowing, too self-reflective, too intellectual. As for the Troggs:

Quite possibly they understood or ruminated about what they were doing on very limited levels. Because that was all that was necessary. Had they been a clot of intellectual sharpies hanging out in the London avant-garde scene, they would most likely have been a preening mess unless they happened to be the Velvet Underground who were a special case anyway. I really believe maybe you've gotta be out of it to create truly great rock 'n' roll, either that or have such supranormal, laser-nerved control over what you are consciously manipulating that it doesn't matter (the Rolling Stones) or be a disciplined artist with an abiding joy in teenage ruck jump music and an exceptionally balanced outlook (Lou Reed, Velvets), or chances right now are that you are almost certain to come out something far less or perhaps artistically more (but still less) than rock 'n' roll, or go under.

From here on in James Taylor and his self-obsessed singer/songwriter peers become the target of Bangs’ ire. But Bangs is soon back on the trail of Reg Presley and co., chasing down the real meaning of ‘66–5–4–3–2­–1’ – the countdown to penetration; the S&M overtones of ‘Girl in Black’ and the anal sex pleasures espoused in ‘I Want You to Come into My Life’ and, of course, the drug scene of ‘Night of the Long Grass’. He spends a good deal of time on ‘I Just Sing’ – ‘an anthem of loneliness and defiant individuality’ that he likens to the Stooges ‘No Fun’ but by this point in his essay the band’s catalogue is looking empty and Bangs is running on fumes.

I’m not a hardcore Troggs fan, other than the two Best of LPs, I’ve a handful of singles and the 3xCD set Archeology from 1992 that Bill Inglot, Bill Levenson, Andrew Sandoval and Ken Barnes put together, the first disc is mostly essential 1966–67 cuts, disc two is filled with not so essential selections from 1967–76. Disc three is the infamous Trogg Tapes . . . Part of the brilliance of Bangs’ take on their catalogue is to ignore the copious amount of filler they recorded, which were anything but explosions of groin thunder. Bangs name checks only twelve cuts (his editor Greg Shaw questioned this self-imposed limit – see above), each Best of has a dozen, and I think that is the perfect number for any Troggs set, so here’s my 2 x 6:

‘Gonna Make You’/’ ‘66–5–4–3–2­–1’/‘I Want You’/‘I Can’t Control Myself’/‘Anyway That You Want Me’/‘Girl in Black’//‘Night of the Long Grass’/‘Mona’/‘I Can Only Give You Everything’/‘Anyway That You Want Me’/ ‘I Want You to Come into My Life’/‘Give It to Me’/‘Louie Louie’.

I’ve dropped ‘Wild Thing’ because I don’t need to hear it again and I anyway prefer those rewrites like ‘I Want You’, not because they refine ‘Wild Thing’ but because they amplify what’s great about it. Bangs’ choice of  ‘With A Girl Like You’ and ‘I Just Sing’ fall short of my other selections because there’s too much Donovan and not enough Bo Diddley in them for my primitive taste buds even if, on the latter, the band put in a little bit of Yardbird-style faux-sitar licks.

Side one starts off in a hurry with the first three tracks but cools it down toward the end with ‘Anyway That You Want Me’ and ‘Girl in Black’. The last of those two songs comes in at just under 2 minutes and is a solid rip-off of The Who (and all the better for that),  while the cello and violin accompaniment on the former, at least in my imagination, following Bangs’ lead, leaks into John Cale’s contributions to the more melodic songs of the Velvet Underground and in Nico’s solo work. Side two stays in mood with ‘Night of the Long Grass’ followed by two non-single tracks, both something of beat standards. Bo’s ‘Mona’ is perhaps the longest cut from 66/7 that they recorded, it has an extended, by their standards, instrumental section but, unlike the Yardbirds say, they are not minded to do much with it; very Stooge-like in its focus, I think. Rob Tyner has said the MC5 recorded a cover of ‘I Can Only Give You Everything’ when the Shadows of Knight got the jump on them and released ‘Gloria’ so they turned to the next best thing in Them’s songbook. I don’t doubt the truth of that but Fred ‘Sonic’ Smith’s slashing guitar riff on the Five’s single is a straight lift from the Troggs’ version.

The last track on my imaginary compilation, which I’ll call I Want –You Want as it seems to adequately distil down the subject and theme of Reg’s songwriting (or maybe I should name it more simply Come), is ‘Louie Louie’ which is at the very heart of the matter. This album cut is by far the best of the period’s covers by a British band and leaves the Kinks’ tepid version far behind even if it doesn’t quite make the grade of the Sonics, whatever it’s a good place to end things.

In his inestimable study of ‘Louie Louie’, Dave Marsh ignores the Troggs version but he homes in on its most potent progeny, ‘Wild Thing’. Marsh writes,

Art it may not possess, but in its own way ‘Wild Thing’ is a rock ’n’ roll classic. The way it descends to lower depths with each bar is so astonishing, its unending thud so remorseless (the Troggs aren't playing this way because it's effective, even though it is – they're doing it because they can't think of anything else), that it just about takes your breath away, clouds your vision, brings unbidden moistness to the corners of your eyes. Of course, these symptoms might be nothing more than a neurological reaction to the axe murder of Western musical civilization, but let's cut the clowns some kind of break.                                                                            

Bangs would have agreed that the Troggs held no pretension to creating art but they were not clowns, idiot savants perhaps? I like to think of them as carnivalesque jesters capable of upending the courts of Procol Harum, Jethro Tull and the like – a band whose role was to cock-a-snook at those who thought themselves to be the band’s betters.

In January 1965 reader Alex Donald wrote a letter to Record Mirror about Richard Berry’s ur-text, or what he called a ‘pop yardstick’, ‘Louie Louie’:

British pop must be in a desperate state when the whole scene has revolved round one song – The Kingsmen’s ‘Louie Louie – for months. Besides completely copying the Kingsmen’s vocal and instrumental style, The Kinks rose to fame with two watery twists of this classic, then provided us all with endless amusement by recording it openly [released November 1964 on Kinksize Session EP]. Heinz had his second biggest hit ever with another disguised version of this R&B opus [‘Questions I Can’t Answer’] and recently it has been put out as a single on Philips by someone sounding like an in competent one-man band [Liverpool’s Rhythm And Blues Inc]. The parasites should at least leave off the newer American greats.

The Troggs version was yet to come, but I doubt Alex would have felt more kindly disposed toward it than he did to any other of the British covers. One of the issues conveniently ignored in Bangs’ piece was that, at least to the more hip British ears, the Troggs were always sort of behind the times, their parsing of ‘Louie Louie’ or Bo Diddley’s big beat had long been abandoned by the Kinks and Pretty Things. The Troggs in their company feel like an anachronism, or an echo.

Chris Britton’s slash and chime guitar patterns were very obviously modelled on Pete Townshend (checkout the perfected Who-like guitar chord that introduces the bridge in ‘I Can’t Control Myself’) giving a modern steel-sprung edge to the antediluvian thump of Ronnie Bond and Pete Staples’ rhythm section. Just as complementary to Britton’s guitar shards was Reg’s lewd thug sneer, which was often backed by a simple, most un-Who like, vocal refrain ‘da dah, da dah’ that would be varied, when the need for novelty called, from song to song by using ‘pah’, ‘bah’ or ‘lah’. The Troggs didn’t deal in subtlety, that was their appeal. They weren’t complex like the Who, full of contradictions, rather their method was, as Richard Meltzer called it, ‘blatant overstatement’ that Bangs more pertinently named ‘groin thunder’.

Postscript

In June 1973, Melody Maker’s Roy Hollingworth interviewed Reg Presley in Hyde Park. At age 31,  the singer was a veteran of the music scene, chubby and ruddy cheeked, he spends much of his time with Hollingworth making lewd comments about women who pass by. Once he was a pop star now he is simply ‘legendary’: the Troggs, were a ‘very heavy little band to be sure. “Punk music”, says Reg. “I like that word punk”’.

The band are capitalising on their fabled status and taking their act onto the university circuit:

‘Was at Hull the other week’, said Reg . . . ‘and after a couple of numbers we thought we’d turned up at the wrong gig. I mean people were screamin’ out and clappin’ and goin’ wild . . . I thought Reg old boy, what’s goin’ on here?’

In the State’s the Troggs’ reputation had been enhanced by the use of ‘Wild Thing’ on a Miller’s beer commercial and then the single  is ‘installed on the infamous Nobody’s jukebox, Bleeker Street’ and then word of mouth has done its turn and, ‘so’, writes Hollingworth, here [in New York] starts the Troggs Preservation Society’. Lester Bangs’ piece is not mentioned but Reg’s repeated and enthusiastic use of ‘punk’ to describe his band could hardly have come from a more local source; ‘Wild Thing’ and I Can’t Control Myself’ are ‘very punky records. Hollingworth explains:

. . . everything works in cycles. There’s a progression from a basic quality, through success to an art form – but then it must go back. It doesn’t of course go back to the exact basis it started from. It goes back having collected valid points during its progress. But if it didn’t go back ‘then rock will become as boring as jazz’, as Reg would have it.

‘If you could do anything this year’, Hollingworth summarises, ‘it would be to see The Troggs punking it out for the whole world and making it. It's people like Reg Presley that keep this business sane to a degree . . . ‘We're whap, whap, whap’, said Reg, ‘And I think that’s what it’s about’.

A few months before Hollingworth, NME were rolling with the Troggs as the Punk ur-text . . . December 16 1972

Review of Dirty Real in Journal of Popular Film and Television (December 2024)

The Last Movie montage from Seventeen (July 1970)

From the late 1960s into the mid-1970s, the traditional wellspring of American cinema was threatened, redirected, and ultimately enriched by the emergence of what came to be known as “New Hollywood.” This was an era in which young filmmakers, actors, musicians, and other creatives carved out a cultural niche which still endures in the imagination and aspirations of many people across the globe almost 60 years later. It is this epoch which animates Peter Stanfield’s Dirty Real: Exile on Hollywood and Vine with the Gin Mill Cowboys, published by Reaktion Books.

The titular “Dirty Real” refers to a decidedly bohemian lifestyle which could include a rootless existence with spartan lodgings when on the road, a cultivated inattentiveness to appearance (clothes/hair/hygiene), conspicuous and guilt free pleasure seeking (sex/drugs/alcohol), and a rejection of the establishment (school/work/family/capitalism), all of which represented an alternative version of that great American ambition, freedom. It was this aesthetic, manifest in the setting, plot, characterization, and soundtracks of several dozen films in the late 1960s-early 1970s which Stanfield posits as the core of the “Dirty Real” canon.

A running theme in the book is the quest for the authentic “dirt,” a commodity which the filmmakers and actors took great pride in pursuing, accomplishing and presenting to an audience with an appetite for such fare and apparently an ambition or fantasy to pursue that life for themselves. Nonetheless, Stanfield argues that these actors, directors, writers, and their productions fell short of legitimacy. In its filmic form it was modification, affectation and ultimately commodification of the genuine Dirty Real. On the faux authenticity of the Dirty Real filmmakers, Stanfield proclaims “the trick they pulled off was to suggest they had gained it by hard-scrabble labour, from experience earned on the road, with sweat and dirt honestly come by. In self-defined exile, with their privilege hiding in plain sight, they had this tale to tell, and they told it with glorious, splendid elan” (40).

The author also notes that this emerging genre was not fully original, but rather inspired by old archetypes which were re-booted in the late 1960s and early 1970s. For example, in New Hollywood’s contemporary action films, the lead characters rode motorcycles and drove souped-up cars (Easy Rider, Bonnie and Clyde, Two-Lane Blacktop), and in the new historical westerns (The Hired Hand, The Wild Bunch, Dirty Little Billy, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid) the cowboys and criminals were often morally ambiguous misfits whose licentiousness, remorseless violence, and anti-social behavior is often accepted without the judgement and punishment that was expected in Old Hollywood productions. Stanfield also marks a mid-sixties revival in the iconic films and persona of Humprey Bogart as a benchmark in the rise of Dirty Real. As he remarks, “For the film-makers of New Hollywood, Bogart was not only a figure they might identify with, he was also someone they would refract in their own anti-heroes” (13), albeit in films that were infused with unfettered permissiveness (sex and violence), unvarnished cynicism, ambiguous heroism and without the obligatory happy or just ending.

In one final blow to authenticity of the Dirty Real film community, Stanfield notes the symbiotic, or was it mutually parasitic, relationship between the new American cinema and the rock/pop music of the era. It seems the Dirty Real “street cred” of New Hollywood was enhanced by the close association with the world of pop-rock music, particularly in the eyes of a youthful audience. Putting aside the possible appropriation of pop music’s hip grittiness, it is hard to imagine many of the most iconic films of this era without their rock soundtrack, and it seems beyond question that the music enhanced both the films and the status of the musical acts. One of the unexpected and defining elements of Dirty Real is Stanfield’s analysis of the role of popular music in many of the films and the way the pop/rock culture informed the Dirty Real aesthetic.

The book has eight chapters bookended by a scene setting introduction and brief conclusion. Each chapter is thematic and anchored by a focus on one or more films: Chapter One: The Hired Hand; Chapter Two: The Last Movie; Chapter Three: The Last Picture Show, Five Easy Pieces, and Payday; Chapter Four: The Shooting, Ride in the Whirlwind, and Two-Lane Blacktop; Chapter Five: Cisco Pike; Chapter Six: Dirty Little Billy; Chapter Seven: McCabe and Mrs Miller; Chapter Eight: Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid.

The Hired Hand

The analysis in the chapters is comprehensive in its coverage of each film and its place within the genre and in the zeitgeist of the era. This includes a detailed account of the film’s plot, in-depth character studies, as well as a deconstruction of the central conflicts which drive the story and motivate each role. Stanfield also adroitly links elements of these “dirty” films with dozens of other productions from various decades. Ample time is also dedicated to how the films were received after release, encompassing film critics, box office receipts and the engagement of the general public. Readers who enjoy behind the scenes content will find details on financing, casting, inter-personal drama, and the jockeying for credit and acclaim in the face of success. Additionally, the author offers an examination of many of the actors, writers, and directors who rose to fame in the New Hollywood, in what amount to mini era-specific biographies of personalities such as Jack Nicholson, Peter Fonda, Dennis Hopper, Peter Bogdanovich, Monte Hellman, James Taylor, Kris Kristofferson, Robert Altman, Sam Peckinpah, and Bob Dylan. This list of people highlights the predominance of white males in this era, a fact to which the author alludes but does not extensively analyze.

Stanfield supports his narrative with ample endnotes for each chapter, including sources ranging from academic publications to contemporary periodicals to memoirs and mass market biographies. Additionally, there is a bibliography and selected filmography which highlights the films discussed in the text. The book is also populated by thirty-two illustrations presenting movie posters, commercial ads, album covers, and movie stills.

Dirty Real offers great utility in an array of academic disciplines including American Studies, Media/Communications, Musicology, and Film Studies at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. The book would also be of interest to cinephiles and general audiences because of its engagement with iconic films, music, and cultural touchstones and characters who retain a measure of recognition and relevance fifty years after their artistic hightide began to ebb.

Stanfield’s great accomplishment with Dirty Real is to highlight and cut through the posing pretentiousness of these filmmakers, actors and writers to reveal the cultural/social artifice that imbued so much of the 1960s–1970s New Hollywood filmography. Yet he also manages to express his admiration for their artistic endeavors; he does not discount the quality, value, and impact of many of these films. As Stanfield says, “The films’ characters, as with the actors, writers and directors, were costumed in the pitch that defileth and showed too an acute nostalgia for the gutter none had known at first hand. For a cool moment they almost turned Hollywood into an image of themselves” (8–9).

Madison Ave gets Dirty Real: Left, Dirty Little Billy director Stan Dragoti. Middle, Jack L. Warner, producer, and Cheryl Tiegs, Sports Illustrated cover star and married to Dragoti

Michael McKenna – professor of history, politics, and geography at Farmingdale State College

The Stooges – Born Dead Losers

Decal stolen from the Coop’s amazing Ed ‘Big Daddy’ Roth collection [HERE]

 

Asked to curate the thirteenth issue of the New York magazine Art-Rite, Alan Vega pulled together thirteen found images. A jockey sat astride his mount on the cover; a newspaper clipping of a photograph of a hostage-taker moments before he blows his brains out; a photograph of Elvis on stage circa 1956; a pornographic image of a man and a woman, head in his lap, her legs open stretched across the backseat of a car; a horse race photo-finish; Iggy Stooge, on all fours, naked torso, raggedy-arse jeans and wearing a dog collar (he looks like some surf bum the morning after a debauched beach party), probably taken at Unganos; a seemingly random page from a horse racing magazine; a cheesecake shot of body builder and blonde woman in bikini; another shot of a horse race; the Marvel comic book figure Ghost Rider; Willie Deville and his paramour Suzie; the bloody torso of a male corpse in a mortuary; and a detail from a painting by Joseph Catuccio. Beneath the final image the editors placed the following:

We dedicate this issue to the average American searching for excitement. These images, punked out from the ambient culture, are the touchstones of a new sensibility, icons of the dissipations and strengths of the modern spirit. Let the way of life idealized in these pages bring into your home the romance of the underculture – horse racing, white trash smut, greasy rock ’n’ roll, muscles, motorcycles and the end of civilisation.

The magazine was distributed free on the streets of New York sometime in 1977, its mix of imagery akin to Andy Warhol’s monochrome death and disaster silkscreens of the early 1960s. If Vega’s collection did pull from a pop art legacy its mixing of an iconography of the ‘underculture’ nevertheless suggested the new shape of things formed in Warhol’s wake – a ‘punked-out’ street culture, where suburban runaway juvenile delinquents looking for a kiss or a fix have landed face down – the sweet ride to the Lower East Side. . . the end of civilisation.

            On stage Elvis and Iggy suggest a continuity between fifties rock ’n’ roll and the seventies version but also the downturn the form had taken, its dissolution. One of the most memorable graphic images used to promote rebel surfer sui generis, Mickey Dora, was ‘da Cat’s Theory of Evolution’ showing the eight stages of man’s development from the ape ‘Retardess Kookus’ to the pinnacle of perfection ‘Homosapens Mickey Dora’ riding the surf. Vega’s collection has the process going in reverse from Presley leaning over the lip of stage with fans hands outstretched toward him to Iggy Stooge crawling on his hands and knees.

That image of the Stooges as an avatar of rock ’n’ roll’s entropy has become the fixed idea about the band that has travelled down to us through the years, restated in the use of the band’s recordings in films, among them the documentary Dogtown and Z-Boys (2002) later turned into a fiction film, Lords of Dogtown (2005), and The Bikeriders (2023) a drama based on Danny Lyons’ photobook from 1968 with the same title.

Dogtown and Z-Boys is as much about creating a legacy for its protagonists as it is a document on the development of skateboarding as a subculture. The filmmakers themselves were the principle participants, their younger selves the skaters who revolutionised the activity. Director Stacy Peralta, a key member of Zephyr competition skateboarding team, the Z-Boys of the title, and co-writer Craig Stecyk, who was responsible for providing contemporary magazines with the reportage that helped propel a bunch of street kids with attitude into the key figures accountable for modernising skateboarding, are both in front and behind the documentary’s camera – they are their own subject.

During the mid-to-late 1970s the Z-Boys reinvigorated a moribund competition scene, reimagined underused urban spaces as skate parks and remade empty suburban swimming pools into an environment that transformed an activity of mostly linear horizontal movements into a set of abstract vertical actions. They took a leisure hobby and made it into a lifestyle, a worldwide subculture.

Illustrated with a parade of period photographs and 8 and 16 mm footage, the now mature skaters look back and explain what had taken place some 25-odd-years ago – a true insider account, authenticity guaranteed, the story of the team who made skateboarding history. More than that it is a wild ride, brilliantly edited by Paul Crowder. Dogtown’s story is told in a breathless mode, a mobile exhibition on the art of the edit – montaged sequences that mimic the reckless thrill of a series of skating stunts. What aids the film’s propulsive edge is not just Stecyk and Glen E. Friedman’s extraordinary photographs of the young skateboarders but also their use of some 45 pieces of music, mostly contemporary hard rock records, by 30 artists. In 1975 the music would have been a certain kind of teenager’s – those shown in the film – idealised jukebox, one great blast after another.

Opening with Jimi Hendrix’s ‘Ezy Rider’ the film finds an informal correlation between the action shown and the topic of the song, Black Sabbath and ‘Into the Void’, David Bowie and ‘Rebel Rebel’, Thin Lizzy and ‘Bad Reputation’, Pink Floyd and ‘Us and Them’, Ted Nugent and ‘Motor City Madhouse’, T. Rex and ‘Children of the Revolution, all play very similar roles. None though is as effective as Alice Cooper’s ‘Generation Landslide’

. . . la la da de da . . . which is given an extended outing to illuminate the Colgate advertising smile behind which the older generation looks down on their off-spring who are seated among discarded razorblades, needles and other detritus while throwing Molotov cocktails in milk bottles from their highchairs – Alice Cooper’s billion dollar babies, surrogates for the Z-Boys.  The two Stooges’ cuts ‘Gimmie Danger’ and ‘I Wanna Be Your Dog’ fill a similar role of soundtracking that generational slide into the void.

While I expect a few of the Z-Boys owned Alice Cooper’s Billion Dollar Babies album or had found ‘Generation Landslide’ on the b-side of ‘Hello Hurray’, so that recording at least was part of their own personal soundtrack and  no doubt they did attend parties where Bowie and Rod Stewart were played and Peter Frampton and Aerosmith would have been radio familiars, but I doubt the same could be said of the two Stooges’ records. These were certainly overlooked by radio at the time and therefore unknown to teenage So-Cal listeners, and yet the Stooges sound entirely apposite, perfectly placed, the ideal musical accompaniment to the shots of abandoned and derelict amusements that ran along the beach fronts of Dogtown.

That stretch of Santa Monica with its pre-war piers and leisure parks has become a junkpile of twisted steel, cracked concrete and blasted asphalt. The post-war promise of baby boom plenitude – beach blanket parties – has been transformed into a teenage wasteland – and became a surfer and skater’s playground. The kiss of an ocean breeze in ‘Gimmie Danger’ that Iggy sings about, coupled with the messed up, lovelorn, protagonist of ‘I Wanna Be Your Dog’ – a deadbeat figure to mirror the new decade’s dead end kids – are used to emphasise the idea that the skaters are living in the wreck of society. It is here, out beyond the law, where the kids have made their own culture. They did this, as one of the doc’s talking heads said in that space where the ‘debris meets the sea’ – paraphrasing Iggy Pop and James Williamson’s ‘Kill City’.

Even though the use of the Stooges demands a level of historical reinvention that is not the case with the two Led Zeppelin tracks from Presence that appear toward the end of the film, the fact that the Michigan band make a more notable appearance, create a bigger impact than Jimmy Page’s combo, is because they were constructed out of the same raw materials that the skater’s made their world from. By seemingly being ignored back in their day, the Stooges’ outsider status compounded a negationist sensibility – the ‘no’ to the Americann ‘yes’ – which gives them an authenticity that a band like Aerosmith can only gesture toward. Like the Dogtown skaters the Stooges are the real thing – born dead losers who become winners.

(The fictionalised version of the documentary, Lords of Dogtown (2005), stays true to the original soundtrack though less impactful, more subliminal. The two Stooges tracks are ‘TV Eye’ and ‘Loose’.)

That image of the Stooges carrying the charge of a generation in freefall is there once more on the soundtrack to The Bikeriders. It’s a film like Dogtown and Z-Boys that flirts with authenticity. It is filled with the kind of pop and blues one might imagine cluttering up a jukebox in a biker bar but is much too self-aware to be the real thing. When the Stooges come bowling in with ‘Down on the Street’ it is to mark the characters’ end of days, with hard drugs ripping through the gang’s comradery and its leadership challenged. Play The Stooges or Fun House while flicking through Danny Lyon’s book of photographs and interviews with Chicago’s Outlaw MC, published in 1968,  on which the film is based, and you have a seemingly perfect corollary between the book and the record, but it is one that has been learnt – it was never a given that the two might co-exist.

Also filched from the Coop’s collection (and as worn on a t-shirt by a Birthday Party-era Nick Cave

Films like Dogtown and Bikeriders actualise the links that were once hidden or muted between the Stooges, hoodlum cyclists, surfers, hot rodders, rock ’n’ rollers and their Kustom Kulture supply sergeant, Ed ‘Big Daddy’ Roth. Back then, no one hired the Stooges to appear in a party scene in an outlaw biker movie, or licensed their records for the soundtrack, they weren’t catered to by Roth like he did with the Birthday Party, providing the illustration for their Junkyard album (1982) or by his peer Robt. Williams, who did the same for Guns and Roses’ Appetite for Destruction (1987), though conceivably they might have been.

The undertow created by the use of the Stooges on the Dogtown soundtrack ensures not only the now familiar thrill of hearing authentic 1970’s punk music before the fact of the Sex Pistols or Ramones but it also gives to the filmmakers and skater’s legacy an added layer of hip, a cool façade that is a wholly retrospective gloss. The knock on influence of the use of the band’s music in such films is that future movies about born losers that don’t feature the Stooges’ wah-wah throb on their soundtrack are all but unimaginable. The band have now been moved from the margin to the centre, outsider icons whose image on t-shirts sell in shopping malls like Roth’s once did in Woolworths.

As for Alan Vega he and his partner in Suicide, Martin Rev, they made their big screen impact this year in Civil War with ‘Ghost Rider’ a fitting soundtrack for the end of days. America’s alternative anthem, ‘Dream Baby Dream’, played over the closing credits. Bruce Springsteen’s cover of the later had been previously used in American Honey (2016)

Ugly Things on the Dirty Real

Two new reviews of Dirty Real . . . Frank Uhle has penned the one for Ugly Things and David Pitt for The Booklist. Uhle is the author of Cinema Ann Arbor, which is one of the best film books of this or any other decade, so colour me happy to read his positive take on my book. Pitt’s summary is equally pleasing:

"Stanfield is a perceptive and graceful writer; he imparts knowledge to the reader while never sounding like he is lecturing. ... While this is a period of film history that has been written about before, Stanfield's expertise and depth of knowledge make it feel like this is something we're seeing for the first time."

The Sweet Ride – the best there is at sex, surfing or cycling

I suspect that The Sweet Ride didn’t attract my attention back when I was researching Hoodlum Movies because it is not one thing or another even though it does have scenes with outlaw bikers. Malibu’s m’cyclists take second place to the surfing sequences, which in turn are somewhat overwhelmed by the tennis set and the sexual manoeuvrings of club members. In the end it is only the pulchritudinous attraction of Jacqueline Bisset . . . and the blast of Moby Grape playing house band at the psycho-delightful discotheque that remains in the memory.

Having bought the rights to William Murray’s 1967 paperback original, The Sweet Ride, 20th-Century Fox produced a hybrid drama that studio head, Darryl F. Zanuck, described as ‘tailored especially for youth. About the dropouts who live on the fringes of society, it may serve as an inspiration for those seeking to drop back in’ – sensationalism sold as a cautionary tale. Advertising copy for the film put a little more spice into the mix:

This is a wild trip into the world of the Now Generation. . . from the neon haunts of Vegas, the velvet traps of Hollywood to the Malibu beach parties.

Here are the people trying to make the Sweet Ride, that one moment when you know you're on top and you're the best there is at sex, surfing, or cycling. Add half a dozen beautiful girls to the scene and you get explosive right-now action-packed drama.

The exciting young cast of ‘THE SWEET RIDE’ includes Michael Sarrazin, sensational star of "The Flim-Flam Man," and Bob Denver, a TV favorite from ‘GILLIGAN'S ISLAND’. Gorgeous Jacqueline Bisset, who emerges topless from the California surf only to plunge her co-stars into mystery, violence and romance, joins Michele Carey, Lara Lindsay, Stacy King, and Corina Tsopei - The ‘Psychedelights’ - to give ‘THE SWEET RIDE’ all the sex appeal it can hold!

While in production, The Sweet Ride was described by the trade press as a ‘modern beach-scene drama’ and as a story about the ‘beach life of today’s go-go youth’. Its premise was an update on the out-of-date beach party film – the sweet ride to the darker side of that milieu. Sex, drugs and psychedelic music used to despoil the image of innocence portrayed in the Annette Funicello  and Frankie Avalon bikini beach blanket surf romps.

In 1965, William Murray had reported back to suburbia on the horrors of the Hells Angels for the Saturday Evening Post and had now worked these folk devils into his novel that exposed the bohemian lifestyles of a tennis pro, a jazz pianist and a surfer who live together in a Malibu seafront house. Their everyday world is turned upside down when Vickie ( Jacqueline Bisset) appears topless from the surf breaking on the beach beneath their pad.

The novel and film open with a young woman being thrown out of a car and left for dead at the side of the road. While the film is coy about what has happened, the novel is more explicit in detailing the sexual assault she had to endure. The story proceeds from this attention grabbing opening via a set of flashbacks featuring those who have had a role in the events that led up to the opening.

The victim, Vickie, is a movie starlet living a double-life; in love with a young surfer, Denny (Michael Sarrazin), but also hopelessly caught up in the sexual games played her producer. Hollywood glitz and glamour is set alongside the contumacy of Denny and his two housemates who avoid all forms of responsibility. Not one of them is invested in earning a living, Choo Choo Burns (Bob Denver) is a jobbing jazz man who hates rock ’n’ roll, Collie Ransom (Anthony Franciosa) is a tennis bum speeding into middle-age. Ciphers for the bohemian lifestyle of non-conformists. The contemporary sign of the times is the effort they and their peers put into avoiding the draft at all costs; the war in Vietnam is not their concern, and the police, like Vickie’s censorious parents and Denny’s drunken mother, are not to be trusted or held in any form of esteem.

Anthony Franciosa and Bob Denver create a frame for a Moby Grape poster

Their social world includes tennis clubs and dive bars, Beverly Hills mansions and beach-side crash pads, Las Vegas gambling rooms and Sunset Strip discotheques where Moby Grape perform in a swirl of a psychedelic light show with silent Keystone cop movies projected on the walls. In this detonating pop-art inevitable the young dance to the heavy beat sound of Skip Spence and his band mates and have their senses fried in that goofy cartoonish way that Hollywood of the time represented lysergic emanations.

Skip Spence goes full Pete Townshend

Variety’s reviewer was unimpressed: ‘Flat, but briefly exploitable programmer about young people. Needs strong support on grind duals . . . The Sweet Ride could sum up as Hell’s Angels’ Bikini Beach Party in Valley of the Dolls near Peyton Place.’ The film was all of those things and none of them, its hoodlum bikers, led by two familiar faces from previous roles in the outlaw cycle, Charles Dierkop and Lou Procopio, act and dress as if they were an Ed Roth caricature bought to life. Their club is called ‘Freaks’ (‘69’ in the novel) and its members are laden-down with swastikas, Iron Crosses and German helmets and exude not much more menace than Eric Von Zipper (Harvey Lembeck) the biker figure in Beach Blanket Bingo.

after a raid on the Nazi costume box

Charles Dierkop and Lou Procopio

Similarly the surf scenes are less than spectacular and not enlivened one bit by the appearance of a surf Nazi, Rick the Stuka, who tries to give our hero a hard time. The Stuka is an obvious caricature of Mickie ‘da Cat’ Dora – the hippest of the hip among the real surfing fraternity – but Stuka’s role didn’t add up to much beyond reinforcing the idea that youth subcultures wantonly adopted Third Reich symbolism to make themselves as obnoxious as possible.

The Sweet Ride is a Beat Generation hold-over movie with an acute case of ennui and an inept studio’s attempt to reach the audience attracted by product from independents like AIP and to those whom figureheads like Ed  Roth peddled his goods, putting into play those elements of delinquent outlaw culture it understood as appealing to contemporary audiences. All of this it wrapped around the age-old melodramatic trope of the corruption of the young woman cast adrift in the big city. In its grab-bag approach to popular culture The Sweet Ride can only gesture in an enervated manner to the hip and the cool it so desperately, so very obviously, wanted to emulate. But yeah, Jacqueline Bisset, who steals the show, Moby Grape and a cameo from Lee Hazelwood, his title song sung by Dusty Springfield, might, on a good day, be enough to play out some spare time

Lee Hazelwood and Anthony Franciosa

***

Dusty’s re-recording of the title song was released as a single on Philips, it is marvellous. It was also the lead track on the soundtrack album helmed by Pete Rugolo. The Moby Grape’s contribution escaped inclusion but eventually, in edited form, was released on Vintage: The Very Best of Moby Grape (Columbia, 1993) and Sundazed’s enhanced release of their debut album (2007).

The only digital version currently available (or at least easy to attain) is a 20th Century Fox Cinema Archives release (2013), picture quality is okay but Panavision image is panned and scanned. The film and the Grape sequence are easily found on Youtube.